Skip to content

Revolutionizing Public Works Contracts: Understanding Resolución 262/2024

Introduction: Modernizing Public Contracts for Greater Efficiency

The Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation has embarked on a significant journey of modernization and reform within the realm of public contracting procedures. The aim? To ensure heightened efficiency and transparency in its operations.

Key Points: Streamlining Public Works Contracts

In the pursuit of fostering increased competition among bidders and maintaining financial equilibrium, Resolution 3179/2011 was enacted. This resolution targeted long-term projects, those with an original execution period of one year or more.

Ensuring Fairness and Transparency

Subsequent measures, such as Resolution 845/2014, were implemented to uphold these principles. This resolution applied Decree 1295/2002 to public works outlined in Resolution 3179/2011, specifically addressing financial advances and material procurement.

Establishing Oversight Mechanisms

The creation of the Public Works Price Redetermination Unit via Resolution 2625/2016 aimed at comprehensive monitoring and control of price redetermination processes.

Adapting to Economic Realities

In response to evolving economic landscapes, Decree 490/2023 replaced previous regulations with updated price redetermination frameworks for public contracts.

Strengthening Regulatory Compliance

Acknowledging these changes and aiming for consistent adherence to work plans, it’s imperative to align with these updated provisions to ensure clarity and fairness for both the Court and contractors.

Reforming Administrative Structures

Changes in price redetermination frameworks necessitate adjustments to the composition and functions of existing units, as outlined in Resolution 2625/2016.

Removing Temporal Constraints

Experience gleaned from recent years highlights the need to eliminate temporal limitations set forth in Resolution 3179/2011.


Legal Consultation and Authorization

The involvement of the General Administration Secretariat and the General Legal Secretariat underscores the comprehensive approach to this resolution.

Conclusion: Embracing Progress for Enhanced Contracting Practices

With Resolution 262/2024, the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation reaffirms its commitment to modernization and transparency in public contracting. By adapting to evolving economic landscapes and revising regulatory frameworks, it paves the way for fairer, more efficient practices.


Why is modernization crucial in public contracting?

Modernization ensures that procedures remain efficient, transparent, and adaptable to changing needs and economic conditions.

How do these resolutions impact contractors?

Contractors benefit from clearer guidelines, fairer processes, and increased transparency, fostering a more conducive environment for competition.

What role does oversight play in these reforms?

Oversight mechanisms, such as the Public Works Price Redetermination Unit, ensure adherence to regulations and fair implementation of contracts.

What are the implications of delegating authority to the General Administration Secretariat?

Delegating authority streamlines decision-making processes and ensures swift adaptation to evolving circumstances within the realm of public contracting.

How does Resolution 262/2024 contribute to legal clarity?

By removing temporal constraints and updating regulatory frameworks, Resolution 262/2024 provides clarity and certainty for both the Court and contractors.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Optimized by Optimole